E-book and e-audio survey, 2014

Photo of a pile of books and an ereaderYou may recall Andrew Coburn from Essex put a message on lis-pub-ebooks earlier this year asking for information from other authorities, so that Essex could benchmark their e-lending service.  He’s kindly given us permission to replicate his survey summary, and here it is.

(Picture:  CC Melenita2012)


Essex Libraries were early adopters of e-books – we subscribed to OverDrive in early 2004 and other suppliers soon after. We got into e-audio quickly too and at one point had three suppliers for each of e-books and e-audio. However our offer had grown ‘like Topsy’. It meant that customers had to get used to different ways of accessing and using stock from different suppliers and remember which was which.

However for Essex, like all public authorities, the improvements in e-offers and budget considerations made us review our e-offer at the end of 2013. Part of the consideration was to ask how much use we get for how much money. While we can get figures for our own service, we had no idea if these are typical. We wanted to benchmark provision against other authorities and so sent out the survey. The survey went out in late May on lis-pub-ebooks and lis-pub-libs.

30 authorities (including Essex) responded. One did not have e-books and four did not have e-audio. One had only recently gone live but I encouraged them to complete the survey for their comments.


In use

Of e-audio suppliers OneClick Digital was the most used (62% of e-audio respondents.) For e-books OverDrive was most used (55% e-books and also 49% e-audio). Askews & Holts showed a reasonable customer base and, as one respondent pointed out, they have the all-Wales consortium though only two responses were received from that group. Bolinda/ Borrowbox are beginning to build a customer base – they were the only other supplier mentioned more than once.

Ulverscroft, Peters and Public Library Online (Bloomsbury) were also listed.

Zinio and Press Display were also mentioned but fall outside the area in which we were interested.

Additional comments.

Two authorities have recently stopped using one or more suppliers – focusing their provision more specifically.

Six authorities were looking at new suppliers- either in addition to current provision or as their first step. Interestingly OverDrive and Askews & Holts were not mentioned in this context.

E-Books – spending and use

Two thirds of respondents spent up to 3% of their total book budget. Of the rest there were two (7%) spending 11- 15%. The others are between those levels.

Two thirds of authorities reported loans of up to 1% of total book loans on e-books. The remainder report 2-3%.

E-Audio– spending and use

There is a wider spread on spend. 11 authorities (38%) are only spending up to 3% but the others are spread over the other 4 levels offered. 6 (17%) spend the equivalent of over 16% of their Spoken Word budget on E-Audio.

Issue percentages are also varied from up to 1% (10 authorities or 34%) to 6% plus (another 11 – 10%) with the balance between those two figures.

Access mechanisms

Most (if not all – it’s not quite clear from the responses) provide separate access through the library website. About half load records to their main catalogue which link to the e-supplier sites and slightly more have a separate e-book/ e-audio catalogue (also linking through to the supplier sites.) This implies that some offer access through the main catalogue but have a separate e-book/ e-audio catalogue as well.

In the additional comments box there seemed to be some enthusiasm for having records in the main library catalogue but not everyone is there yet. In some cases, issues with LMS were mentioned, but others were not specific as to the problem. At least a couple of authorities cite the need to have a dummy item attached to the catalogue record to make it display on the OPAC – a cumbersome process.

Other comments

E-books/E-audio are felt to be popular amongst users and there was enthusiasm to be able to expand whatever offer is already there, but pressure on budgets is preventing this in some cases as well as issues such as problems of integration with catalogue and LMS.

Frustration with the range of content available was expressed by a couple of people.

There was one plea for a national e-book/ e-audio offer. Nobody explicitly mentioned Sieghart’s e-books review or the pilot projects resulting from it.

The benefits of sharing provision in consortia such as the All-Wales one (and at least one other) were also mentioned.


The Survey was useful for Essex in that we can see where stand by comparison with other authorities. We have carried on with our review and made some radical changes this year – we are now down to just two suppliers. This means we have simplified the offer to customers for the present and intend to devise a longer term strategy in early 2015 with a view to trying to ensure that the money is there for the next and future financial years.



The Magic of Libraries: an animated blockbuster

We love this! The Magic of Libraries video from Time to Read has had nearly 3000 views in less than a week. What an inspiring way to celebrate National Libraries Day 2014.

As well as being a beautiful piece of animation by Emily & Anne, the video contains eleven book references. Some are more obvious than others and I can only find four. Luckily for us Time to Read NW will reveal all the answers via Twitter – one a day at 4pm, for the next ten days.

Find out more about Time to Read, the North West Libraries Reader Development Partnership.

Testing the impact of e-lending

Society of Chief Librarians and the Publishers Association Invitation To Tender

“Testing the impact of e-lending both on-site and remotely upon the Public Library and Publishing sectors”.

This is an invitation to UK local authorities
The closing date for tenders to be submitted is the 1st November 2013
Here is some detail from the ITT document: (for full detail click on the link at the top of this post to go to the SCL website)

“Criteria for the pilots
Libraries and publishers have been working closely together to design pilots which control as many factors as possible, whilst varying four elements. It was agreed by the SCL and the Publishers Association that we should identify:

  • A local authority representing a largely rural population who will loan ebooks for 7 days
  • A local authority representing a largely rural population who will loan ebooks for 21 days
  • A local authority representing a largely urban population who will loan ebooks for 7 days
  • A local authority representing a largely urban population who will loan ebooks for 21 days

Each of these pilots will be asked to purchase a pre-agreed list of approximately 1,000 titles. This list will include a combination of front and back list titles from the major publishing houses, works from some of the most prominent authors in the UK and new titles as they are published. In turn, we will ask the local authorities (and their suppliers) to:

  • Meet the standard terms of business of each publisher
  • Meet standard accessibility requirements
  • Comply with industry-standard DRM and work with a secure and robust system
  • Provide a ‘click to buy’ button for all books included in the service
  • Be operational by 1 February 2014 (contractual agreements permitting)
  • Commit to allocating the budget and purchasing the pilot titles
  • Providing the pilot consistently throughout the year

Local authorities and their suppliers will also be asked to provide a report six months into the pilot and within a week of its conclusion detailing:
Physical habits

  • Change in number of members of the library service (and each individual library in the service)
  • Change in footfall to those libraries
  • Change in socio-economic profile of members
  • Change in lending and profile of the lending E-lending habits
  • Number of registrations
  • Number of logins per user, average and range
  • Number of books borrowed per user, average and range
  • Web analytics eg. consumer journey / entry and exit pages

None of this will have any affect on any existing e-lending service or contractual agreements that a local authority may already have in place.

Project Timetable
The indicative timetable for the project is:

  • Deadline for submissions: 1 November 2013
  • Short-listing of pilot authorities : 4 November 2013
  • Negotiation with short-listed authorities and interviews where necessary:
  • week beginning 11 November
  • Announcement of participating library authorities18 November 2013
  • Chosen suppliers / aggregators to enter into commercial agreements with publishers November / December 2013
  • Publishers to confirm list of titles following agent / author agreement:November / December 2013″