The Right to E-Read

Did you know that, unlike with printed books, libraries do not have a right to lend e-books?   And did you know that, unlike with printed books, only a small number of e-book titles are made available to libraries?   Most people do not know this, and are astonished to find out.  Libraries should have a right to e-lend because everyone deserves the right to e-read.  EBLIDA, the European Bureau of Library Information and Documentation Associations, agrees and has launched a Right to E-Read campaign.

Why are printed books and ebooks treated differently?

The difference in treatment of printed and e-books stems from copyright law, where lending constitutes a subgroup under the category of “distribution”. The rights holder has exclusive control over whether to publish or not, but after the first sale the distribution right is exhausted. This is known as the “first-sale doctrine” or “exhaustion doctrine”. Once exhausted, the rights holder, often publishers, cannot control subsequent lending or re-sale of the physical object. As a consequence, the library decides what books to buy and use for lending and how long to keep the books for.  And it’s not just libraries that rely on this right of exhaustion, it underpins the secondhand book trade too.  Without it, if you wanted to sell your unwanted books to your local bookshop, or offer them for sale on Amazon, you’d need permission from the publisher first.

In their interpretation of European copyright law publishers and some legal scholars claim that e-books are “communicated to the public” rather than distributed, that communication to the public is a “service” and the exhaustion doctrine does not apply to services. As a result the library can only acquire an e-book by entering into a contract with the rights holders and rights holders are free to decide whether they want to give access to a specific work, and to decide on the terms of such access. This means that the library cannot loan e-books without permission.  It also means that libraries are tied into long-term subscriptions to aggregator services to prevent e-book titles being lost. And it’s not just library e-books that are acquired under licence.  Did you know that when you “buy” an e-book, you aren’t “buying” it in the traditional sense, you are actually buying a right to access it with terms and conditions attached?    Although there are challenges to this interpretation in the European courts, the position may take years to resolve.

Why does this matter?

Libraries have to rely on publishers being willing to grant them licences to lend e-books, but some are refusing to do so, or are demanding unacceptably high prices and terms. Research conducted in February 2013 by Shelf Free found that 85% of ebooks were not available to public libraries.   Out of the top 50 most borrowed adult fiction books of 2012, only 7 were made available by publishers for libraries to e-lend – and even then it depended on which supplier the library service was signed up to. With one supplier, only two titles were available.  Public libraries promote literacy and foster a passion for reading and so, as e-lending looks likely to become a major form of lending, they must be able to provide a wide range of digital content to the communities they serve.  Not to cater for the increasing demand for e-books will turn libraries into museums of the book.

Why are publishers withholding titles?

Some trade publishers view e-lending as a threat to their business, arguing that if people can borrow an e-book, why would they buy one?  We agree that publishers are entitled to a reasonable return on their investment and we understand why some are cautious of digital distribution.  However, rather than damaging sales, available research shows that libraries enhance sales and are important customers for publishers.  A 2011 study reports that 50% of all library users in the USA report purchasing books by an author they were introduced to in the library, for example.

The ongoing e-lending pilots, initiated as a result of the Sieghart Independent Review on E-lending, will enhance our understanding of the dynamics of e-lending, including the impact on the e-book market, and are very welcome. However, they are predicated on a licensing solution which will leave the power with publishers. This threatens the mission of public libraries to provide access to knowledge and works of the imagination, and gives publishers undue influence over the collection development policy of library services.

A right to e-read?

What is required is a change to European copyright law to enable libraries to purchase and lend e-books. This is at the heart of the European Bureau of Library, Information and Documentation Association’s (Eblida – www.eblida.org/) Right to E-read campaign, which was launched in May last year.  The campaign focuses on:

  • Raising awareness in the professional library and information community, so that they become advocates of change
  • Alerting politicians and members of the public to the situation, so that they support such change
  • Directly lobbying the EU for this change.

The focal point of the campaign is an E-reading Day on 23 April, the UN’s World Book and Copyright Day. The aim is that all national professional associations should issue a press release on the Right to E-Read campaign and, if possible, organise events on the day.

Shelf Free and CILIP, the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals, are getting behind this campaign.  We are calling for a fairer copyright framework that enables libraries to lend and at the same time provides reasonable remuneration for publishers and authors – both Shelf Free and CILIP are supporting authors in their campaign to extend Public Lending Right to e-books loaned by libraries remotely, which also requires a change to EU copyright law.

If you want to become an advocate for change so that everyone has a right to enjoy and benefit from the e-books provided by libraries, please get behind the Right to E-read campaign.  The EU Commission has announced a review of copyright law this year, so the time to campaign for these changes is now.  Supporting material and further information is on the CILIP website at: bit.ly/1fsPl76

Yvonne Morris, Policy Officer, CILIP: The Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals

3 thoughts on “The Right to E-Read

  1. Pingback: CILIP Urges Cable to implement copyright reforms

  2. Pingback: Internet Librarian Rough Cut: Evolving Ebook Models | Librarian From Alaska

  3. Pingback: El préstamo digital en las bibliotecas españolas y británicas: semejanzas y diferencias « Actualidad Editorial

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s